Assad’s fall is a staggering loss for Iran, as Syria was the cornerstone of its "Resistance Front," a network designed to counterbalance Israel and American influence in the region. Iran had invested heavily in Syria’s infrastructure, military support, and political stability over the past three decades, and the loss of its ally is a significant setback. The once-unified axis of resistance is now fractured, with the Houthis, Iraqi militias, and a weakened Hezbollah the remaining proxies in Iran’s regional network.
While Iran is much larger and more powerful than Syria, the fall of Assad could inspire a shift within the Iranian populace. Just as Syrians once believed Assad’s regime was invincible, many Iranians similarly view the reign of the Ayatollahs as unassailable. However, the swift collapse of Assad’s regime may offer hope to Iranian opposition forces, potentially strengthening their resolve, according to Jerusalem post reports.
Though Iran’s opposition is fractured and lacks central leadership, Assad’s downfall could serve as a symbol of what is possible. If Assad can fall, so too can Khamenei, many Iranians might conclude. The speed with which Syria’s regime crumbled could encourage those seeking change in Iran, giving them a renewed sense of hope and purpose.
Iran’s economic difficulties, already severe, could worsen in light of Assad’s collapse. The loss of Syria as a strategic ally and economic partner — particularly in terms of oil, trade routes, and reconstruction projects — compounds Iran’s economic woes. Furthermore, the return of Donald Trump as president could increase international pressure on Iran, exacerbating internal economic challenges and increasing domestic unrest.
Iran’s investment in Syria, estimated in the billions of dollars, has now been wasted. The regime’s inability to protect this investment, alongside its failure to prevent Assad’s fall, may contribute to a perception of weakness, both among the Iranian populace and its regional adversaries.
As the events in Syria unfold, Iran’s leadership may attempt to contain any internal unrest inspired by these developments. Increased repression is one likely response, aimed at quashing protests and maintaining control. Alternatively, the regime could attempt superficial reforms or concessions to placate discontent.
The most dangerous scenario, particularly from an Israeli perspective, would be for Iran to accelerate its nuclear weapons program. Feeling increasingly vulnerable, Iran might conclude that nuclear deterrence is essential for regime survival. However, such a move would likely provoke a harsh Israeli response, potentially escalating tensions further.
The fall of Assad has shaken Iran’s regional position, exposed vulnerabilities in its economy, and may serve as a catalyst for renewed domestic unrest. While it is too early to predict whether these developments will lead to a revolution, the events in Syria could inspire the Iranian opposition, challenge the regime, and set the stage for future instability.
As Khamenei’s optimistic statements about Hezbollah and Assad seem increasingly disconnected from reality, Iran’s future remains uncertain. The regime’s ability to maintain control may hinge on its response to both external challenges and the growing internal dissatisfaction that could follow in the wake of Syria’s dramatic shift.
0 Comments