Student government at Michigan University: "We will freeze funding unless university divests from Israel"

University of Michigan's Library (Photo: Shutterstock / Jonathan D H)

In a contentious move, the University of Michigan's newly elected student government is making waves with its stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict. The Central Student Government (CSG), now led by the "Shut It Down Party," is threatening to disrupt campus life by withholding funding from student groups unless the university divests from Israel.

The atmosphere on campus is tense as students grapple with the implications of this decision. With control over a substantial $1.3 million annual budget funded by student fees, the CSG's actions could have far-reaching consequences. Student government president Alifa Chowdhury has already vetoed a proposed summer budget for student groups, signaling the seriousness of their intent.

Despite the mounting pressure, the university administration is standing firm. In a resolute statement, a spokesperson declared that the University of Michigan would bypass the student government if necessary to ensure funding for registered student organizations.

The situation has left many students feeling uneasy. While most Jewish groups on campus are cushioned from direct financial impact due to funding from Michigan Hillel, there are concerns about the broader implications for Jewish students. The potential for a chilling effect on campus life looms large, with some students worried about the impact on their organizations and activities.

This controversy at Michigan is not an isolated incident. Across the United States, universities are facing similar tensions as student activists push for divestment from Israel. The New School in New York City has seen its student senate make similar promises, while other institutions face mounting pressure to consider formal divestment proposals.

As the debate rages on, opinions among Michigan students remain deeply divided. Some voice concerns about the potential disruption to campus life, while others passionately argue for redirecting frustration towards the Board of Regents.

With the university's Board of Regents standing firm against divestment and President Santa Ono taking a tougher stance on some pro-Palestinian protests, the stage is set for continued conflict.

* Arutz Sheva contributed to this article.