Jewish prayer, Tel Aviv ban, Judaism, holidays

"Rosh Yehudi" Appeals Ban on Segregated Prayer

Following a district court ruling that segregated prayer cannot take place on Yom Kippur, the organization "Rosh Yehudi" and 30 secular petitioners have appealed to the Supreme Court. They argue: "The right to pray does not infringe on equality! Public space belongs to everyone!"

Prayers (Photo: Avshalom Sassoni, flash90.)

In response to the district court's ruling, the Tel Aviv municipality supported the decision, stating that segregated prayers would not be allowed in public areas of the city. Approximately 30 petitioners, including the organization "Jewish Head," submitted their appeal to the Supreme Court this morning. In a statement, the petitioners said: "We will continue to fight for our right to pray in our way, according to our beliefs and the traditions of Israel. Judaism is stronger than any municipal regulation and more than the unfortunate decision of the Tel Aviv municipality to exclude the traditional community from public space, and Judaism itself."

They added, "We expect the Supreme Court to overturn the decision and allow us and thousands of other worshippers to pray in separation, just as our ancestors have done for thousands of years. In our anthem, we sing: 'To be a free people in our land.' This freedom applies not only to Zion and Jerusalem but also to Tel Aviv."

The petitioners further noted, "Interfering with the style of prayer under the guise of preventing women's exclusion is condescending, as if we do not understand what we are doing… Modesty is not exclusion! Self-respect is not discrimination! The right to pray does not harm equality! Public space belongs to everyone!"

Recall that in the ruling by Judge Erez Yakuel this week, it was stated: "Regarding the issue of separation, I found no reason to replace the municipality's discretion with my own, as I am not convinced that the decision deviates significantly from the realm of administrative reasonableness. It is based on clear sources, and no elements of arbitrariness, discrimination, unfairness, lack of proportionality, or consideration of irrelevant factors were identified. Even if a different decision could have been made, it does not necessarily indicate an administrative flaw in the decision as it was rendered."


0 Comments

Do not send comments that include inflammatory words, defamation, and content that exceeds the limit of good taste.

Shameless Anti-Semitism

"Zionist murders children": Jew forced out of Norwegian store 

Avi Nachmani | 09.01.25

Outrageous and disgraceful

Brussels schools boycott Holocaust Memorial over Gaza War  

Avi Nachmani | 09.01.25

The only time we fast on Friday

When the Fast of 10th of Tevet Falls on Friday: A Practical Guide

Gila Isaacson | 09.01.25

Baruch Dayan HaEmet

Tragedy Strikes: Jewish Teen Dies in UK Crash Days Before Bar Mitzvah

Gila Isaacson, JFeed Staff | 09.01.25

Rescued from the flames

Torah scrolls rescued as wildfires rage throughout Los Angeles 

Avi Nachmani | 08.01.25

Parents Demanded Separate Davening

First Conservative Solomon Schechter School in North America Becomes Orthodox

Gila Isaacson | 08.01.25

Best universities going down the tubes

Sarah Lawrence under fire: Federal probe into anti-semitism allegations 

Avi Nachmani | 08.01.25

The farce continues

Ireland officially enters Hague proceedings against Israel

Avi Nachmani | 07.01.25
Get JFeed App
Download on the App Store
Get it on Google Play