Following the Storm on Social Media

Harvard was Alarmed by the Criticism: "There is No Place for these Calls"

After the storm on social media, Harvard clarifies: "Calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community, or any religious or ethnic group are vile, they have no place at Harvard."

(Shutterstock)

After a tumultuous day in which social networks were filled with criticism of the words of the presidents of important universities in the US in a congressional debate in which they avoided responding about the institutions' attitude to calls for Jewish genocide in Israel, Harvard panicked and issued a clarification statement.

In a tweet that was uploaded to the university's Twitter network, the president's statement was quoted, which read that "some have confused the right to freedom of expression with the idea that Harvard would agree to calls for violence against Jewish students. Let me clarify: calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community, or any religious or ethnic group are despicable, they have no place at Harvard, and those who threaten our Jewish students will be held accountable."

This statement came after the Republican congresswoman Elise Stefanik - a right-wing politician who graduated from Harvard - asked the president of the university, Claudine Gay, whether such chants violate the rules of conduct of her university. Gay squirmed and said it depends on the context.

President of MIT: Only if the calls are addressed to individual people they are problematic

Other university presidents were present at the discussion. MIT President Sally Kornbluth responded to the question by saying that "only if they are directed at individuals, not as a public statement," she said. She even suggested that "they will check whether such statements are considered abuse if they are serious or common."

"If such discourse becomes conduct, it can be considered abuse, yes," said Liz Magill of the University of Pennsylvania. When Stefanik pressed her, Magill added that "if it's a targeted, severe or widespread statement, it's harassment." When Stefanik demanded that she answer "yes," Magill added that it was "a decision that depends on the context."

"Is this a decision that depends on the context? Is this your testimony today?" Stefanik replied. "Do calls for genocide against the Jews depend on the context? Isn't that considered insolence? That's the easiest question to answer with 'yes'."

Harvard University US Congress Twitter

1 Comments

Do not send comments that include inflammatory words, defamation and content that exceeds the limit of good taste.

The comment was sent successfully.
Soon the response will be examined by our editors and if it is found to be correct it will be published on the website.
The comment was sent successfully.
Soon the response will be examined by our editors and if it is found to be correct it will be published on the website.
1
Harvard: You have social responsibility as your name carries with it ideas and wisdom. See this and use it wisely.
................. 06.12.23


Breaking the Glass Ceiling

Jewish Jessica Tisch is NYPD's new commissioner 
Gila Isaacson | 21.11.24

Russia: This base is in our crosshairs

Russia fumes over new US base in Poland 
Gila Isaacson | 21.11.24

Nuclear sabre-rattling

ALARMING: Russia fires nuclear-capable missile in Ukraine war  
1
| Avi Nachmani | 21.11.24

Biden, Israel, and the journey of the US President

In honor of his birthday: 10 things you didn't know about Joe Biden
4
| Eliana Fleming, JFeed Staff | 20.11.24

Hostages left out of UN Security Council Ceasefire Resolution

US opposes UN security council's Gaza ceasefire proposal, calls for hostage release
2
| Eliana Fleming, JFeed Staff | 20.11.24

The UN - United against Israel

UN Security Council set to vote on Gaza ceasefire
6
| Avi Nachmani | 20.11.24

Iran sweet talking its way to the bomb

Iran offers uranium cap to sidestep UN action 
7
| Avi Nachmani | 20.11.24