Jewish prayer, Tel Aviv ban, Judaism, holidays

"Rosh Yehudi" Appeals Ban on Segregated Prayer

Following a district court ruling that segregated prayer cannot take place on Yom Kippur, the organization "Rosh Yehudi" and 30 secular petitioners have appealed to the Supreme Court. They argue: "The right to pray does not infringe on equality! Public space belongs to everyone!"

Prayers (Photo: Avshalom Sassoni, flash90.)

In response to the district court's ruling, the Tel Aviv municipality supported the decision, stating that segregated prayers would not be allowed in public areas of the city. Approximately 30 petitioners, including the organization "Jewish Head," submitted their appeal to the Supreme Court this morning. In a statement, the petitioners said: "We will continue to fight for our right to pray in our way, according to our beliefs and the traditions of Israel. Judaism is stronger than any municipal regulation and more than the unfortunate decision of the Tel Aviv municipality to exclude the traditional community from public space, and Judaism itself."

They added, "We expect the Supreme Court to overturn the decision and allow us and thousands of other worshippers to pray in separation, just as our ancestors have done for thousands of years. In our anthem, we sing: 'To be a free people in our land.' This freedom applies not only to Zion and Jerusalem but also to Tel Aviv."

The petitioners further noted, "Interfering with the style of prayer under the guise of preventing women's exclusion is condescending, as if we do not understand what we are doing… Modesty is not exclusion! Self-respect is not discrimination! The right to pray does not harm equality! Public space belongs to everyone!"

Recall that in the ruling by Judge Erez Yakuel this week, it was stated: "Regarding the issue of separation, I found no reason to replace the municipality's discretion with my own, as I am not convinced that the decision deviates significantly from the realm of administrative reasonableness. It is based on clear sources, and no elements of arbitrariness, discrimination, unfairness, lack of proportionality, or consideration of irrelevant factors were identified. Even if a different decision could have been made, it does not necessarily indicate an administrative flaw in the decision as it was rendered."


Do not send comments that include inflammatory words, defamation, and content that exceeds the limit of good taste.


80 years on, Anti-Semitism still thrives

King Charles to commemorate Auschwitz liberation's 80th anniversary

Avi Nachmani | 19.12.24

A Worthy Act, For Sure

Knesset passes Rav Kook Day law on preliminary vote

Avi Woolf | 18.12.24

No end in sight

Minneapolis synagogue defaced with swastikas

1
| Avi Nachmani | 17.12.24

It's nearly Hannukah so hurry and order 

10 Hanukkah gift ideas we absolutely love

1
| Gila Isaacson | 17.12.24

Bad news for Benny Friedman fans

London venue cancels Benny Friedman concert over Pro-Israel stance

Gila Isaacson | 17.12.24

Culinary victory

Israeli shawarma spot makes NY Times best list

Avi Nachmani | 15.12.24

From Enemies to Brothers in Song

The musical revolution that united Judaism's greatest opponents

Gila Isaacson | 15.12.24

Trump's personal guests of honor

Donald Trump invites Ultra-Orthodox Rabbis to the White House 

Gila Isaacson | 15.12.24

Dawson: "Jewish students don't need help because they are all wealthy"

Michigan University fires Jew-hating DEI Director  

Gila Isaacson | 14.12.24

It's Brilliant, If You Think About It

Here's how to drive all those tzedaka scammers crazy

Moshe Manies | 12.12.24

Something's really rotten in the state of Australia

Australia probes IDF background of Israeli tourists

Avi Nachmani | 12.12.24

Anti-semitism takes root at Oxbridge

Cambridge controversy: Academic celebrates Hamas attacks 

Avi Nachmani | 12.12.24

Echoes of Germany 1939

NEW JERSEY: How a Jewish boy's haircut became a hate crime

Gila Isaacson | 12.12.24
Get JFeed App
Download on the App Store
Get it on Google Play